Trusted and Reliable Services from an Employment Law Attorney
When your employer doesn't play fair, put Raymond Nardo, Esq. in Mineola, New York, on your team. He handles various employment law issues and is a committed attorney who focuses on obtaining results for all of his clients. Get the representation you need when dealing with claims involving overtime pay, discrimination, sexual harassment, whistle-blower claims, and nearly all other employment claims.
You may be eligible to receive double damages for your employer's refusal to pay minimum wage or overtime. You can collect damages for up to six years, and your boss will likely be personally liable for these damages. Make your voice as an employee heard by hiring Raymond Nardo, Esq. as your attorney
today.
Employment Law Video
Minimum Wage
Is your employer stealing your wages? Mr. Nardo has can recover your wages plus additional damages in New York State.
Overtime
Working long hours, let Raymond Nardo, Esq. make sure that are responsible for your overtime pay.
Sexual Harassment
Have you been sexually harassed? Are you being harassed at your workplace? Let Attorney Nardo obtain justice for you.
Restaurant Wage
If you work at a restaurant, there are special laws considering minimum wage and tip sharing. If you are being treated unfairly, contact Mr. Nardo today.
NYSDHR
If you have been discriminated against. Attorney Nardo can file a charge of discrimination at the New York State Division of Human Rights.
Whistleblower
Whether its the financial industry, patient care, or general health and safety, contact Attorney Nardo if you think you have a whistle blower claim.
Get to Know Attorney Nardo
You are in good hands when you turn to Raymond Nardo, P.C.
in Mineola, New York for legal advice. He has concentrated his practice in labor and employment law for more than 28 years, representing employees, employers, and labor unions.
Affiliations
Arbitrator for FINRA (1996 – Present)
Arbitrator for the District Court of Nassau County (1997 – Present)
Mediator for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (2001 – Present)
Mediator for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (2016 – Present)
Professional Memberships
New York State Bar Association
American Bar Association
Nassau County Bar Association
Suffolk County Bar Association
National Employment Lawyers Association
Admissions
New York State Bar - February 27, 1991
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York - May 1, 1991
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York - May 21, 1991
United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit - April 25, 1995
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - May 22, 1995
United States Supreme Court - May 17, 1999
Published Articles
St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks: Burst Bubble in Employment Discrimination — New York Law Journal, Aug. 9, 1993, at 1
Evidentiary Issues in Discrimination Litigation — Vol. IX, No. 2 of the Journal of the Suffolk Academy of Law, 1994, at 139
Panel Clears At-Will Employees Civil Rights Suits — New York Law Journal, August 14, 2000, at 1
Supreme Court Rejects - Pretext Plus - for Discrimination Cases — Vol. 26, No. 1 of the New York State Bar Association Labor Employment Law Section Newsletter, Spring 2001, at 19
Commitment to Legal Excellence
With 28 years of experience and hundreds of cases filed in the Federal Court and State Court on behalf of his clients, Raymond Nardo, Esq. has the skills and experience to handle your employment issues. He also practices extensively at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the New York State Division of Human Rights (NYSDHR).
When you hire Raymond Nardo, Esq. as your attorney, you receive a top-notch service. In a reported decision on December 18, 2006, the United States District Judge for the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Hon. Arthur D. Spatt wrote the following:
"Initially, the Court must comment on the level of legal services rendered by the attorneys on both sides of this case. The trial advocacy of Raymond Nardo, for the plaintiff and attorneys for the defendant, was outstanding. The trial attorneys were well prepared, conscientious, diligent, and equally important, courteous and ethical in upholding the traditions of our profession. In addition, the post-trial submissions were well written, relevant, and helpful in all respects. These kinds of concise and focused writings have greatly assisted the Court in its determinations of these multiple motions."
